Other Talents On this Category

Hi,

I'm a former Nurse and just recently resign so that i can take care of my baby! I need extra money even it is work from home to sustain the needs of my baby.

If you need your work to be done immediately at a low cost, I can do it for you!! I have done many data entry works from my previous job. I will do data entry accurately and submit before the given deadline. I also thought that this job is best for me. My typing speed is also good that is about 45 to 50 words per minute. I can type very fast without errors. I am very much thankful to you if you give me a chance to work with you so that i can prove my self and the benefits of my works can be grabbed by you for your organizations growth and expansion. 

I can assure you that i will complete all my works very effectively & efficiently before the deadline of the task. Also i will not expecting payment at a higher rate from my employer. Rather i just want a reasonable payment for the work done by me. Doing work and doing work in a systematic manner is two different things. I believe that the work done in a systematic manner by following all the protocols is more effective and beneficial. So i do all my works systematically and as per instructions given which is required to be followed to get a good outcome.

Thankyou for giving your precious time to read my talent description!

I am 18 years old anyway age is just a number . I am a student of second year at government associate degree college .It's not about the look's it's about the work. I do data entry work accurately, fastly and submit it within the deadline. If you need your work to be done immediately at a low cost. 

Give me one chance to prove myself.I will not give you a single chance to complain and you will do well. I was searching for part time job. i am fresher.I currently live in Rawalpindi But I am from also rawalpindi in Pakistan Right now I study in government associate degree college . I have just completed first year. There is not a single backlog in my subject. 

And my marks are also good. I have studied in the village till 10th standard. I am now in Rawalpindi and studying.Sir give me a chance I will do your work well. I will not give any chance to complain, I do more work apart from data typing. Like data typing, firm filling, captcha filling, etc. I can do all these things. 

And I also write content. I take it. I do all these things. That too will be your work time to time. I will submit before the deadline. Moreover, I will work 4 or 5 hours a day.

Hello

I'm Mai Hosni 38 years old

am experienced in many things especially editing texts, typing, data entry and love that work 

I got graduated from faculty of arts, English Department and experienced in Data Entry. I will submit the work before the deadline accurately and professionally. 

I'm interested to do more work and learn more about such interesting jobs. I do my data entry or any other assigned tasks accurately and professionally and always on time. 

have worked as a data entry executive over the past few years and have required expertise to deliver the work quickly.

I can do the work for you in the least possible time and provide you with the assurance that the work done is quality work. You can get in touch with me to discuss in detail the project and fix a price.

I can assure for you that you will get data accurate, up-to-date, and well-organized, leading to better decision-making and improved business operation

If you are focusing on efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and improved data management you can contact me

Hi, I am Aprilyne Suico from Philippines. It is my first time seeking for a job here in Homebased. I have a work experienced as a documentation staff in a logistic company for 2 months. After my contract ended, I decided to resign from my previous job to take care of my senior citizen parents as both of them are sick. I may stayed in kur house for so long, that doesn't stop me to learn and enhance my skills in data entry and using excel. Every night, I spent some hours studying some excel formulas that I may used when I get a job. I also spend time looking for a homebased jobs that suits my knowledge and skills. I am also seeking for a job not just to earn money but also to enhance and utilized my skills.

Aside from data entry, I also do love writing and editing. I can also proofread, edit misspelled words, and transcribe audios into words if you want me to. I do believe that writing makes our heart and mind feels at peace. It makes us calm and somehow, escape from reality. Writing also helps us to ease our tension and anxiety.

Even though this is my first time, I can assure you that I will do and finish my project on time and I'll make sure that I'll give you the best satisfaction and the best service throughout my work. Please, give me a project to prove myself.

The idea that absolute power corrupts absolutely and thus people should be ruled by the word of law instead of whims of an individual or discretions of a selected few has been there in popular realm since the time of Aristotle, however in modern legal literature, the one who popularized this conception by the use of word, rule of law, that is so fluently used in political and legal discourse today, was AV Dicey. As the question demands, in this answer I will attempt to analyze what AV Dicey's conceptualization of this principle was, its short comings and how far the conditions in UK today abide by his ideals. AV Dicey described rule of law by three core principles of his that were, that no man should be punished except for the breach of law, this meaning that only a violation of law should result in punishment, as dicey further noted discretion should not result in legal sanction for there to be rule of law. Second that no man should be above the law and everyone should be equal in front of the law. Third that common law resulted in constitutional principles like freedom and rights, so courts are protector of liberty. The first principle that no man should be subject to arbitrary power or whims in UK gained gradual acceptance as it evolved from an absolute monarchy to a constitutional monarchy. In Magna Carta the King accepted this principle to be subjected to law. Subsequent parliament through numerous statutes tried to further strengthen this principle and today it is nearly an established fundamental of UK constitution that no man can be punished without a violation of law. The court decision in Entick v Carrington, established this principle by stating that no interference with rights of an individual can be done without expressed legal sanction allowing it. So by the time Dicey was putting forth this proposition, it was by in large a reality on ground in the UK. However, this does not avail that discretionary powers had ended by then. The government still exercised certain discretionary powers in case of an emergency, Jennings in his criticism of this limb of Dicey's argument states the numerous discretionary powers enjoyed by the police which negate the argument that in presence of discretions rule of law cannot exist and he argues that such discretions are essential to any modern executive. However, on deeper analysis of Dicey's writing we find out that by discretion he meant the executive in the ancient day ruling by whims. That is certainly not the case today in UK, even though discretionary powers still exist as they do in every country but they are sanctioned by the law and thus not a violation of the word of law. Further to add to this the principle that no one should be punished unheard, has also been upheld and now it is a convention right protected by the ECTHR and HRA, so based upon this we can assume that UK's legal system adequately confirms to dicey's first principle of the rule of law. The second principle that all men should be equal to law is key to the people's perception of justice not only being done but seen to being done and judicial system being fair because as Bingham points out without it, the trust of masses will be lost and they will move toward taking law in their own hands. Dicey's assertion that all men whether they be rich or poor, weak or powerful and most importantly part of the executive or the common masses should be held equal is fundamental to Rule of law even today. It defines the very principle approach of law in any democracy. UK has largely abided by this principle; the government ministers have been subject to the law; the most recent example was the home secretary being held in contempt of court in the case of M v Home Office. Further numerous statute including the CRA have enshrined this principle as an absolute of UK's constitution that no man is above the law. However, in UK there are offices that enjoy constitutional immunity. Dicey himself stated that the rule does not apply to the Queen because the Queen could do no wrong. Academics argue that this poses considerable qualification to what Dicey wants to assert as an absolute. When some men enjoyimmunity they can certainly not all be equal in front of the law. This is why Bingham qualification that all men are equal before the law until the circumstances require differentiation is a better description of how things operate in the UK. However, what dicey was trying in his time to state by his assertion that Queen could do no wrong, was that certain office for the well-functioning of the system require exception, this is not to suggest they hold this immunity as a person, if queen is impeached tomorrow she will surely be subject to law as all individual but that it is the office that enjoy this immunity. This is same in most modern democracies where Head of Government and Head of state (US President) enjoy certain immunities to ensure a smooth functioning of their office, so UK is not different in anyway in this regard. Further since parliament being supreme can in special circumstances where a gross breach of conduct or commission of a crime took place can possibly undo this immunity this in essence mean that UK does ascribe to this principle. It is just that stating it as absolute won't be right description. The third principle that the court are the protector of Human Liberties is true but to certain major exceptions. It is true that time to time availing the common law, courts have recognized new rights (R v R Marital Rape) but how far they can fulfill this role in vacuum is open to considerable limitations. As Jennings points out numerous rights and liberties have been accepted by the statutes or through the tools provided